{"id":3491204,"date":"2026-07-22T16:23:09","date_gmt":"2026-07-22T16:23:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/2026\/07\/22\/substacks-latest-feature-reveals-which-users-have-been-crafting-their-newsletters-using-ai\/"},"modified":"2026-07-22T16:23:09","modified_gmt":"2026-07-22T16:23:09","slug":"substacks-latest-feature-reveals-which-users-have-been-crafting-their-newsletters-using-ai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/2026\/07\/22\/substacks-latest-feature-reveals-which-users-have-been-crafting-their-newsletters-using-ai\/","title":{"rendered":"Substack\u2019s latest feature reveals which users have been crafting their newsletters using AI"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Substack has introduced a new feature that reveals which of your preferred newsletters are generated using AI technology.<\/p>\n

This week, the newsletter and writing platform unveiled an integration with Pangram, an AI writing detection tool, enabling users to analyze posts, comments, and replies on Substack\u2019s app to estimate the proportion of content authored by humans versus AI.<\/p>\n

In the immediate future, this initiative might negatively impact Substack\u2019s business, as it could reveal numerous newsletters on its platform that are not entirely crafted by humans. This might weaken trust in the platform\u2019s collection of independent news and blogs, potentially harming its standing as a provider of high-quality content.<\/p>\n

However, in the long run, AI-detection capabilities could help keep Substack devoid of \u201cAI slop\u201d and foster greater user confidence that what they are reading is penned by real individuals or, at the very least, help them understand when it’s not.<\/p>\n

Image Credits:<\/strong>Substack<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Substack follows several platforms that are beginning to label AI-generated content, particularly as AI assumes a larger role in the creation of such content. Social media sites now mark photographs and videos created with AI, while music streaming services have recently started labeling and sometimes penalizing AI-generated music.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is a positive application of AI,\u201d stated Substack CEO Chris Best.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen I used to present Substack to authors, I would say… we\u2019ll handle everything except the challenging part,\u201d he elaborated during an online discussion with Pangram\u2019s founder, Max Spero. \u201cYou need to possess something \u2014 an idea that\u2019s worth reading, worth caring about, worth sharing. That single element is quite difficult and immensely valuable\u2026 [S]oftware should manage everything else, but the hard part should fall to the individual.\u201d<\/p>\n

This feature will be accessible in Substack\u2019s app for any post, note, reply, or comment exceeding 100 characters. Substack will also permit its writers to incorporate an optional AI author note, allowing creators to disclose their use of AI, as informed to TechCrunch by the company.<\/p>\n

The corporation clarified that this tool is not intended to hinder or punish AI-assisted writing, but rather to motivate writers to add a \u201chow I create this\u201d explanation, detailing their methods.<\/p>\n

Additionally, publishers can run Pangram on their own drafts prior to publication and can report and remove scans of their work that they believe contain errors.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn\u2019t affect our editorial independence.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\n

Substack has introduced a new feature that reveals which of your preferred newsletters are generated using AI technology.<\/p>\n

This week, the newsletter and writing platform unveiled an integration with Pangram, an AI writing detection tool, enabling users to analyze posts, comments, and replies on Substack\u2019s app to estimate the proportion of content authored by humans versus AI.<\/p>\n

In the immediate future, this initiative might negatively impact Substack\u2019s business, as it could reveal numerous newsletters on its platform that are not entirely crafted by humans. This might weaken trust in the platform\u2019s collection of independent news and blogs, potentially harming its standing as a provider of high-quality content.<\/p>\n

However, in the long run, AI-detection capabilities could help keep Substack devoid of \u201cAI slop\u201d and foster greater user confidence that what they are reading is penned by real individuals or, at the very least, help them understand when it’s not.<\/p>\n

Image Credits:<\/strong>Substack<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Substack follows several platforms that are beginning to label AI-generated content, particularly as AI assumes a larger role in the creation of such content. Social media sites now mark photographs and videos created with AI, while music streaming services have recently started labeling and sometimes penalizing AI-generated music.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is a positive application of AI,\u201d stated Substack CEO Chris Best.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen I used to present Substack to authors, I would say… we\u2019ll handle everything except the challenging part,\u201d he elaborated during an online discussion with Pangram\u2019s founder, Max Spero. \u201cYou need to possess something \u2014 an idea that\u2019s worth reading, worth caring about, worth sharing. That single element is quite difficult and immensely valuable\u2026 [S]oftware should manage everything else, but the hard part should fall to the individual.\u201d<\/p>\n

This feature will be accessible in Substack\u2019s app for any post, note, reply, or comment exceeding 100 characters. Substack will also permit its writers to incorporate an optional AI author note, allowing creators to disclose their use of AI, as informed to TechCrunch by the company.<\/p>\n

The corporation clarified that this tool is not intended to hinder or punish AI-assisted writing, but rather to motivate writers to add a \u201chow I create this\u201d explanation, detailing their methods.<\/p>\n

Additionally, publishers can run Pangram on their own drafts prior to publication and can report and remove scans of their work that they believe contain errors.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn\u2019t affect our editorial independence.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3491205,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3491204","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3491204"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3491204"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3491204\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3491205"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3491204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3491204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/techingeek.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3491204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}