Disabling Music Clips in Spotify

Disabling Music Clips in Spotify

Spotify has implemented some unconventional user-experience decisions that can often lead to confusion. The application’s design is disorganized, featuring multiple panels, and it consistently monitors user activities. Additionally, there seems to be an unwillingness to allow full album playback. These aspects create an impression that Spotify’s creators are directing users to engage with the platform in certain predetermined ways.

Users have voiced their displeasure regarding the inclusion of music videos on Spotify, especially since they automatically start playing in the background when an artist uploads one. Some music videos feature different audio tracks compared to the album versions, which may be distracting. The automatic playback of these videos consumes both bandwidth and battery life, leading to frustration among many users.

The desktop version of Spotify shows videos in a compact album art panel, and enlarging them can be troublesome. The selection of videos on the platform often appears arbitrary, causing some users to turn to YouTube for music video content instead.

Until recently, there wasn’t an easy way to turn off videos on Spotify, but that has changed. A toggle has been introduced in the settings that allows users to disable music videos, as well as features for Canvas and video podcasts. On mobile devices, users can access this by clicking on their profile icon, then choosing “Settings and privacy” and selecting “Content and display.”

In the “Videos and Canvas” section, there are three toggles available: one for music videos, one for Canvas, and one for all other videos, including podcasts. Disabling these options helps decrease bandwidth usage on Spotify.

For the desktop app, users can find these settings by clicking their profile icon, selecting “Settings,” and scrolling to the “Videos and Canvas” section. Tests have confirmed that turning off these settings removes the music video icon from playlists and albums, although a “Switch to video” button remains, which encourages users to reactivate videos if pressed.

Many hope that Spotify will handle music videos more judiciously. Having video playlists distinct from audio-only playlists would be beneficial, ensuring users do not encounter videos when searching for album versions. There is optimism that upcoming updates to the Spotify interface will provide clearer distinctions between various features.

‘Odyssey’ filmmaker Christopher Nolan refers to AI as a clear ‘Trojan horse’

‘Odyssey’ filmmaker Christopher Nolan refers to AI as a clear ‘Trojan horse’

Acclaimed filmmaker Christopher Nolan, known for his Academy Award-winning direction, expressed that he finds it “quite encouraging” to witness a profound skepticism surrounding AI, particularly among younger generations, as his latest adaptation of “The Odyssey” enjoys box office success.

Nolan’s comments came during a conversation with interviewer Hugo Travers, who is known for his YouTube channel under the alias HugoDécrypte. Travers referenced the iconic Trojan horse, which is central to Nolan’s cinematic narrative—he pondered whether AI, similar to the deceptive gift that hid violent Greek soldiers, might be perceived as something beneficial in daily life before transforming into something far more sinister.

With a chuckle, Nolan remarked, “I believe AI to be a Trojan horse that everyone realizes the Greeks are concealed within.” He further characterized the technology as “a clear horse, constructed from glass.”

“I’ve never encountered a technology advancing at such a rapid pace that has been so entirely dismissed by the public,” he noted. “The level of distrust surrounding it is remarkably high, especially among younger individuals. The online response to AI-generated videos, with people around my children’s age dubbing it ‘AI slop’ and labeling it accordingly, reflects that.”

According to Nolan, this skepticism is “extremely healthy, as technology will undoubtedly provide us with incredible benefits, but it needs to be approached with a critical eye.” He emphasized, “The intentions of those providing it must also be scrutinized. That’s how we can fully harness the advantages of new technology, rather than relying on blind optimism that all will be well.” (In contrast, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has been vocally critical regarding the film’s diverse cast.)

While Nolan didn’t specify the precise dangers he associates with AI, the topic has increasingly raised concerns in Hollywood and played a significant role during the 2023 strikes by writers and actors. The Directors Guild of America, which Nolan leads, achieved some safeguards concerning generative AI in its latest agreement.

The director is widely recognized for his reluctance toward certain technologies, such as smartphones; his commitment to film places him at the crossroads of being seen both as a Luddite and an innovator, with “The Odyssey” being the first feature film shot entirely on Imax film and cameras.

When The New York Times inquired if he identifies as a technophobe, Nolan responded, “I consider myself a techno-skeptic,” explaining that his passion for film stems from its superior ability to depict the visual world compared to any digital apparatus he has encountered.

“I continuously adopt new technology, but it often seems marketed at the cost of established systems that could still hold merit,” Nolan remarked. “That’s what I witnessed in my industry — discarding valuable methods along with outdated ones. We almost lost film!”

[embedded content]

When you buy through links in our articles, we may receive a small commission. This does not impact our editorial independence.

Nonprofit Current AI is striving to create the Global Network of AI, accessible to everyone.

Nonprofit Current AI is striving to create the Global Network of AI, accessible to everyone.

In rural India, a farmer captures an image of a wilting plant. She wishes to investigate it online, but English is not her language. There should be no barriers.

This is precisely the challenge that the nonprofit organization Current AI aims to address by creating open, public AI infrastructure. In February at the India AI Summit, it collaborated with Bhashini, the AI language division of the Indian government. This partnership led to the creation of Suno Sutra, which translates to “listening chronicles” in Hindi, a compact, offline device that operates AI in 22 Indian languages without needing an internet connection. “With hundreds of languages and dialects in India, AI currently does not encompass them all,” Current AI CEO Ayah Bdeir remarked in a TechCrunch interview. The device is open-source, inviting developer communities to engage with it.

Founded in February 2025 by Martin Tisne, the nonprofit is making rapid progress. Last month, it allocated $3.2 million in grants to various initiatives within four organizations; most recently (last week), it introduced an open-source AI chatbot at the AI for Good Summit in Geneva.    

Bdeir, who joined in January after heading Mozilla’s AI strategy, previously established littleBits, the STEM education platform that impacted millions of children before its sale to Sphero in 2019.

Current AI operates as a “public-private partnership,” uniting governments, corporations, and philanthropic entities to finance technology that serves the public interest, she informed TechCrunch.   The French government initially funded Current AI with $100 million, alongside contributions from the Ford Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, DeepMind, and Salesforce — leading to a total funding commitment of $400 million. “They are not investors; they are funders,” Bdeir emphasized.

The objective it seeks to tackle is clear: all prominent AI systems today, from OpenAI to Google to Anthropic, are owned by private corporations. “If AI is indeed a groundbreaking technology that will alter every facet of our lives, a public alternative must exist,” Bdeir stated. “Similar to the World Wide Web, accessible to everyone, free of charge.”

Half of the world’s spoken languages are at risk of disappearing. “With English dominating the largest language models and AI systems, many of the world’s languages, and by extension, their cultures and communities, are being neglected,” Bdeir noted.

In response to inquiries about Big Tech’s efforts in multiple languages, Bdeir sharply differentiated their motives. “Big tech constructs multilingual models to broaden their market,” she asserted, “without regard for consent or context.” The outcomes are tangible. “For Indigenous languages, translations of religious texts end up being used as training data before communities have established any guidelines,” she explained.

Beyond just language

An AI’s capability to communicate in a language is merely one aspect it must master. “Language is the vessel through which knowledge, tradition, memory, and identity are transmitted through generations. Thus, when technology cannot speak your language, it cannot preserve your culture,” she pointed out.

Her vision for Current AI is an open system inspired by the early web, where advancements benefit all, no one is excluded, and communities maintain control over their own data.

The first grant round by Current, announced last month, involved distributing $3.2 million to four organizations spanning Kenya, Lebanon, and the Brazilian Amazon.

The initiative in Masakhane, Kenya, focuses on creating AI datasets in over 50 African languages for sectors such as health, agriculture, and education; Lebanon’s Institute for Worldmaking is digitizing Arab cultural heritage and modern practices into machine-readable databases controlled by communities (not tech firms). Brazil’s Portal sem Porteiras is developing offline AI resources in collaboration with Indigenous Amazon communities, ensuring data remains within their territory. Meanwhile, Kenya’s African Internet Rights Alliance is creating auditing tools to hold AI systems accountable throughout the continent.

Data ownership matters

Regarding the issue of data ownership, Bdeir expressed her thoughts candidly. “Several models and proposals exist about data ownership within different communities, but one thing is crystal clear: it should not be in the hands of a Silicon Valley company aiming to enrich a select few,” she told TechCrunch.

The approach of the nonprofit is to store models and data on a local level, engaging community experts prior to any development, or incorporating consent protocols into the process so that communities can halt it whenever they choose.

So far, none of Current AI’s grant recipients have fully resolved the issue. However, Bdeir considers this the goal. “Each of them has integrated the question into their projects,” she stated, “rather than settling for the typical default, where complexity becomes an excuse for a government or a tech company to make decisions for everyone.”

As for the impact that can arise from a $3.2 million budget split among four organizations, Bdeir remarked, “Scale is not always the benchmark. That’s the paradigm of Big Tech,” she noted. “This could manifest as an Indigenous elder in the Brazilian Amazon utilizing a tool developed in Kenya to convey ecological wisdom in their own language.”  

Constructing the stack

Earlier this month in Geneva, Current introduced Alpha Chat, an open-source chatbot created in just seven weeks by a coalition of ten organizations, including Hugging Face, Mozilla, and MIT Media Lab. Each participant contributed a component of the stack, including a language model, safety tools, and computing capabilities.

Current AI also established a partnership with Sakana AI, a Tokyo-based startup recognized for its endeavors in what it labels Sovereign AI. The two organizations intend to develop a shared open-source AI stack, designed to cater not only to the Japanese language and culture but also to communities in the Global South that have largely been overlooked by dominant AI systems.

Purchases made through links in our articles may earn us a small commission. This does not influence our editorial independence.