Submit Your Inquiries: Investigating Internet Dating Frauds

Submit Your Inquiries: Investigating Internet Dating Frauds

For our first-ever WIRED Book Club livestream, Kate Knibbs will be accompanied by the author of *The Yahoo Boys: Love, Deception, and the Real Lives of Nigeria’s Romance Scammers*, Carlos Barragán.

Barragán, a journalist and researcher at *The New York Times*, journeyed to Lagos to connect with young, desperate con artists. His narrative is a witty, touching, and maddening exploration of how the internet can lead to emotional turmoil.

On the Panel

– **Kate Knibbs:** Senior writer at WIRED, concentrating on prediction markets, the future of media, and the influence of AI on the internet. She oversees the WIRED Book Club.
– **Carlos Barragán:** Journalist and researcher for *The New York Times* based in Madrid. Previously a reporter at El Confidencial, he holds an MFA in nonfiction from Columbia University. *The Yahoo Boys* marks his debut book.

Ask a Question

Feel free to send your inquiries about the book in the comments. The event will be streamed here, so save this page for July 16 at 12pm ET / 9am PT.

How to Watch

This livestream is a perk for subscribers. A replay will be offered for subscribers who cannot attend live. **Not a subscriber yet?** [Subscribe now](https://www.wired.com/v2/offers/wira01026?source=Site_0_HCL_WIR_EDIT_HARDCODED_0_LIVESTREAM_2025_ZZ) to gain access to this livestream and complete WIRED content.

Join WIRED Book Club

Begin following along by [reviewing previous discussions](https://www.wired.com/tag/wired-book-club/), and enroll in the WIRED Book Club [here](https://www.wired.com/newsletter/bookclub).

In the meantime, [check out past livestreams](https://www.wired.com/tag/webinar/) on [how AI is transforming work](https://www.wired.com/story/livestream-ai-is-changing-your-job-now-what/), [big tech and the military](https://www.wired.com/story/livestream-the-war-machine/), and more.

New Google advertisement envisions a Declaration of Independence crafted with assistance from AI

New Google advertisement envisions a Declaration of Independence crafted with assistance from AI

Two and a half centuries after the Declaration of Independence was ratified, a fresh advertisement from Google poses the question: How would the Founding Fathers utilize Google Workspace?

With the slogan “Group project, but make it 1776,” the commercial illustrates a largely hidden Thomas Jefferson in the midst of drafting when he receives a persistent message from Ben Franklin, initiating a heavily Google-driven collaborative experience. Suggestions for revisions are made in Google Docs, a meeting is arranged via Google Calendar and conducted virtually through Google Meet (with all participants seemingly keeping their cameras off?), and the entire project concludes with e-signatures; cue the fireworks.

Naturally, given that this is a promotional piece from a tech firm in 2026, AI plays a part. The fictionalized founders employ Google’s “help me visualize” AI feature to experiment with various animals for the national seal, Gemini takes notes during the meeting, and the founders consult the chatbot for guidance before turning down King George III’s request for document access.

The entire presentation is very tongue-in-cheek (at one moment, Sam Adams asks, “Can we settle this over beers?”), and the promotion of AI is relatively subtle compared to many recent advertisements. Unlike that notorious Google ad where a father uses Gemini to compose a fan letter for his daughter, this one avoids implying that AI could enhance the actual content of the Declaration of Independence. Perhaps the most AI-oriented feature of the commercial is the visual footage itself, which, to my perspective, bears the distinctive sheen of AI-generated imagery.

While viewer reactions on YouTube and Instagram seem predominantly favorable, you might not be shocked to discover that feedback on Bluesky has been considerably more critical. Commenters labeled the ad as “cringey” and “remarkably tone deaf,” with the AI aspect becoming the primary target—even as numerous users, including historian Angus Johnston, remarked on how “remarkably little of this involves AI.”

“Even within a cheesy fantasy joke, it’s difficult to argue that AI serves as an effective tool for political organizing, writing, or human collaboration,” Johnston stated.

[embedded content]

When you buy through links in our articles, we might receive a small commission. This does not influence our editorial independence.

Midjourney seeks for Hollywood studios to disclose the specifics of their AI implementation.

Midjourney seeks for Hollywood studios to disclose the specifics of their AI implementation.

In the midst of a continuing legal battle with three Hollywood studios, AI company Midjourney is aiming to require those studios to disclose their own AI usage.

Last year, Disney and Universal filed suit against Midjourney for purported copyright violations, indicating that the startup’s image-generation technology could produce images of characters like Bart Simpson and Darth Vader, owned by the studios. A few months later, Warner Bros. also initiated legal action against Midjourney.

The startup contends that utilizing images of copyrighted characters to train its AI models falls under fair use.

The ongoing controversy centers on the documents the studios must generate during the discovery stage. An earlier ruling determined that the studios must indeed share information about their usage of generative AI – but only when it relates to “consumer-facing” videos and images.

In its recent submission, Midjourney aims to lift that restriction, asserting that it “unjustly” permits the studios “to selectively provide only those documents they think bolster their claims of market harm while denying Midjourney access to documents that could support its defenses.”

Midjourney further asserts that the “documents [the studios] are holding back are exactly those that would disclose whether, behind closed doors, they are engaging in the same practices they are suing Midjourney for.”

For instance, the startup mentions that if the studios are creating image-generating AI models “for internal use in storyboarding or content brainstorming for film or TV, that proof would equally indicate that it is a standard practice, even among the studios, to download and train AI on unlicensed copyrighted material.”

Within the filing, the startup also contends that the studios ought to disclose all prompts they utilized in Midjourney, along with the outputs generated, not merely the prompts that resulted in the supposedly infringing images.

The lead attorney for the studios, David Singer, previously asserted that Midjourney was pursuing this documentation as part of a “fishing expedition.”

He also remarked that the studios “do not aim to halt AI technology or even close down Midjourney’s operations,” but rather “merely wish for Midjourney to cease copying their movies and TV shows and to stop distributing, publicly exhibiting, publicly performing, and creating derivative works that feature copies of [their] iconic characters without permission.”

When you buy through links in our articles, we may receive a small commission. This doesn’t influence our editorial independence.

Alibaba allegedly prohibits its staff from utilizing Claude Code

Alibaba allegedly prohibits its staff from utilizing Claude Code

Beginning July 10, China’s Alibaba will prohibit staff from utilizing Anthropic’s programming tool Claude Code, as per various reports. 

Anthropic has already barred Chinese firms, along with foreign entities associated with those firms, from utilizing its models. The organization has reportedly been addressing loopholes that permit Chinese users access to Claude.

A recent Reddit thread indicated that some loophole mitigation involved a variant of Claude Code that could discreetly recognize Chinese users. Anthropic’s Thariq Shihipar mentioned in a post on X that this was “an experiment we launched in March aimed at preventing account misuse from unauthorized resellers and safeguarding against distillation.” (Distillation refers to a method where AI models are trained on the outputs of other models.)

“Our team has implemented more robust mitigations since that time, and we’ve actually intended to remove this for a while,” Shihipar stated.

Despite this, Alibaba has purportedly categorized Claude Code as high-risk software and is advising employees to utilize the company’s proprietary Qoder tool instead.

What is Mistral AI? All you need to understand about the rival of OpenAI

What is Mistral AI? All you need to understand about the rival of OpenAI

In the wake of the Trump mandate that prompted Anthropic to take its newest AI models offline and increasing demands for indigenous technology to lessen dependence on the U.S., Mistral AI has found itself amidst a storm of interest. However, the French AI sensation is frequently misinterpreted, and its focus on large language models (LLMs) has complicated the narrative. 

Anyone assessing Mistral based on its proximity to becoming ‘the OpenAI of Europe’ will likely be let down. Its chat and agent Vibe, previously known as Le Chat, holds only a fraction of ChatGPT’s brand recognition, and Claude remains more favored than Mistral’s models, even among entrepreneurs at Station F, Paris’ startup hub.

Conversely, casual observers often overlook that the French decacorn is following the Palantir strategy, utilizing forward-deployed engineers who assist governments and major corporations in adopting AI and customizing it for specific applications.

This strategy also aligns better with Mistral’s resources. While there are rumors that the company is aiming to raise approximately $3.5 billion at a valuation of $23.15 billion—nearly double its existing valuation—it still falls significantly short of U.S. frontier laboratories. Nevertheless, its revenue is on the rise; in February, it revealed that its annual recurring revenue had exceeded $400 million, up from $20 million just a year prior, and claimed it was on course to exceed $1 billion in ARR this year.

This growth has allowed Mistral to secure an invitation to high-profile gatherings like Davos, and even in venues where tech CEOs struggle to communicate their messages, such as the French Parliament. Mistral CEO Arthur Mensch has emerged as a public advocate for a distinct vision of AI, but he still has work to do in promoting his own enterprise.

In an extensive LinkedIn post, Mensch elaborated on what the Paris-based company does “for a living”—deploying its models and agent platform on the infrastructure of its enterprise clients, while assisting them in developing custom models through Forge, a platform that enables them to utilize their own data for training.

Nonetheless, the misconceptions and heightened expectations surrounding Mistral do not arise without basis. Named after a wind, the company pursues an ambitious vision. “We exist to ensure that everyone has access to the best AI systems, beyond the centralized control of states or corporations that feel compelled to regulate the final implementation of AI,” Mensch wrote.

This vision implies that Mistral is looking beyond just enterprise solutions. It also intends to continue making significant investments in research to keep pace with foundational AI competitors—and Mensch’s post also discussed where he believes the company currently stands in that context.

“At present, we do not yet have the leading language models, but we are steadily closing that gap. We have an exciting model set to debut this summer—it will be open-weight, and we’ll provide early access to it in July. In areas that are less compute-intensive, such as voice, vision, and document processing, we offer state-of-the-art solutions,” Mensch asserted.

Mistral’s forthcoming model has already stirred some excitement on X, where Mensch and Mistral supporter Marc Andreessen have engaged in humor and promoted memes about what we now know won’t be referred to as “Le Chaton Fat.” This is another indication that the world—particularly “the rest of the world”—is observing whatever Mistral has in store.

The most intriguing developments may be occurring behind closed doors. Earlier this year, Mistral acquired the infrastructure startup Koyeb to advance its plans to create “a true AI cloud.” The company also disclosed a €4 billion investment strategy (approximately $4.56 billion) aimed at establishing data centers in France and Sweden—evoking themes of sovereignty.

“We’re operating on the premise that AI technology is a commoditized resource that every organization needs a secure and affordable supply of,” Mensch wrote. If you’re interested in learning more, continue reading.

Who are Mistral AI’s founders?

Mistral’s three founders share a history in AI research at leading U.S. tech firms that have a presence in Paris. Before assuming the role of CEO at Mistral, Mensch was part of Google’s DeepMind; CTO Timothée Lacroix and Chief Scientist Guillaume Lample are former Meta employees.

Mistral has also awarded the title of co-founding advisers to the co-founders of health insurance startup Alan, Charles Gorintin, and Jean-Charles Samuelian-Werve (who is also a board member). Additionally, it has recently appointed three new executives to bolster its growth: Johan Bergqvist as Chief Financial Officer, Brian Hall as Chief Marketing Officer, and Kamal Brar as SVP, Partners & Alliances.

What are Mistral AI’s main models?

Mistral has created a diverse array of models that range from LLMs to multimodal, reasoning, audio, and OCR models. Not all of its models prioritize size; there’s the appropriately named Mistral Small 4 and “Les Ministraux,” a collection of models designed for edge devices like smartphones. Some are open weights, and it has also made the code agent Leanstral open source.

What partnerships has Mistral AI secured?

In 2024, Mistral finalized an agreement with Microsoft that involved a €15 million investment and a strategic partnership for disseminating the French company’s AI models via Microsoft’s Azure platform.

In May 2025, Mistral announced its participation in the establishment of an AI Campus in the Paris region, as part of a collaborative venture with UAE investment firm MGX, NVIDIA, and France’s state-owned investment bank Bpifrance.

In June 2025, Mistral declared plans to launch a European platform dedicated to AI and powered by Nvidia processors, named Mistral Compute, in 2026. The initiative was acclaimed as “historic” by France’s president, Emmanuel Macron, who shared the stage with Mensch and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang at the VivaTech conference shortly after the announcement.

In July 2025, Mistral initiated AI for Citizens, a program that the company asserted could “assist States and public institutions in effectively leveraging AI for their citizens by transforming public services.”

In September 2025, Mistral partnered with chip manufacturer ASML “to explore the application of AI models across ASML’s product range, as well as in research, development, and operations.”

Mistral has also established strategic alliances with numerous entities, including Accenture, press agency Agence France-Presse, the French military, Luxembourg’s job agency, shipping giant CMA, German defense tech startup Helsing, IBM, Orange, and Stellantis.

How much funding has Mistral AI raised thus far?

Most of Mistral AI’s funding to date has involved debt financing, but the company has also completed several venture capital rounds, totaling around $4 billion, according to Crunchbase.

In June 2023, just a month following its inception, Mistral AI secured a record $113 million seed round led by Lightspeed Venture Partners. Sources at the time indicated that this seed round, the largest in Europe’s history, valued the startup at $260 million. 

Other participants in that round included Bpifrance, Eric Schmidt, Exor Ventures, First Minute Capital, Headline, JCDecaux Holding, La Famiglia, LocalGlobe, Motier Ventures, Rodolphe Saadé, Sofina, and Xavier Niel.

Six months later, Mistral completed a €385 million Series A ($415 million at that time), with a reported valuation of $2 billion. This round was led by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) and included participation from Lightspeed, along with BNP Paribas, CMA-CGM, Conviction, Elad Gil, General Catalyst, and Salesforce.

Microsoft’s $16.3 million convertible investment in Mistral—part of a partnership announced in February 2024—was categorized as a Series A extension, suggesting an unchanged valuation.

In June 2024, Mistral secured €600 million (approximately $640 million) through a combination of equity and debt. This long-predicted round was spearheaded by General Catalyst at a $6 billion valuation, with prominent investors such as Cisco, IBM, Nvidia, and Samsung Venture Investment Corporation participating.

In September 2025, Mistral completed a €1.7 billion Series C round (around $2 billion) led by ASML at a €11.7 billion valuation (about $13.8 billion), with contributions from current backers DST Global, a16z, Bpifrance, General Catalyst, Index Ventures, Lightspeed, and Nvidia.

What companies has Mistral AI purchased?

Alongside acquiring Koyeb, an infrastructure startup, Mistral has also acquired Emmi, an Austrian startup specializing in physics AI, aimed at better assisting industrial firms in their AI transformation.

Will Mistral AI produce its own chips?

While Mistral has not yet created its own chips, Mensch hasn’t dismissed the idea. “Owning the chips may eventually happen; I believe it should occur at some point, but for now, we are depending on Nvidia, which is a fantastic partner for us, and we’re exploring a few options here and there,” he stated to CNBC. 

What might a Mistral AI exit entail?

Mistral is “not for sale,” Mensch mentioned in January 2025 at the World Economic Forum in Davos. “Certainly, [an IPO is] the goal.” 

This aligns with the significant amount the startup has raised to date: Even a transaction with a rumored potential buyer like Apple may not yield substantial enough multiples for its investors, not to mention sovereignty concerns related to the acquirer. 

This article was initially published on February 28, 2025, and will be updated regularly.

By clicking on links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This does not influence our editorial neutrality.

The sole AI glossary you'll require this year

The sole AI glossary you’ll require this year

Artificial intelligence is transforming the world and concurrently creating an entirely new set of terminology to articulate its process. Attend any product meeting, pitch, or panel discussion these days, and you’ll encounter terms like LLMs, RAG, RLHF, and many others that can leave even the most knowledgeable individuals in the tech field feeling slightly inadequate. This glossary is our effort to address that: straightforward definitions of the AI terminology you’re most likely to encounter, whether you’re working with this technology, investing in it, or merely trying to stay informed by reading TechCrunch or engaging with relevant podcasts. We keep it updated regularly as the domain progresses, so think of it as a dynamic document, much like the AI technologies it explains.


Artificial general intelligence, abbreviated AGI, is a vague term. It generally denotes AI that surpasses the average human in numerous, if not all, activities. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman once referred to AGI as the “equivalent of a median human that you could hire as a co-worker.” In contrast, OpenAI’s charter characterizes AGI as “highly autonomous systems that outshine humans in most economically valuable tasks.” Google DeepMind has a slightly different interpretation; it sees AGI as “AI that can perform at least as well as humans in most cognitive tasks.” Confused? Don’t be concerned — experts leading AI research are just as puzzled.

An AI agent denotes a tool that employs AI technologies to carry out a series of tasks on your behalf — surpassing the capabilities of a basic AI chatbot — such as processing expenses, reserving tickets or tables at restaurants, or even producing and managing code. Nevertheless, as we’ve previously articulated, there are many components in this emerging space, so “AI agent” may signify different things to various individuals. The infrastructure is still being constructed to fulfill its expected functions. However, the fundamental idea suggests an autonomous system that may utilize several AI systems to execute multistep tasks.

Consider API endpoints as “buttons” located behind a software application that other programs can engage to trigger actions. Developers utilize these interfaces to establish integrations — for example, allowing one application to retrieve data from another, or enabling an AI agent to directly control third-party services without human manual intervention at each interface. Most smart home gadgets and connected platforms possess these concealed buttons, even if everyday users never notice or engage with them. As AI agents become more proficient, they increasingly can identify and utilize these endpoints independently, revealing robust — and sometimes unforeseen — opportunities for automation.

In response to a simple inquiry, a human brain can provide an answer without much deliberation — queries like “which animal is taller, a giraffe or a cat?” However, in many instances, you often require pen and paper to arrive at the correct response because there are intermediate steps involved. For example, if a farmer has chickens and cows, and collectively they possess 40 heads and 120 legs, you might need to jot down a simple equation to deduce the answer (20 chickens and 20 cows).

In reference to AI, chain-of-thought reasoning for large language models indicates the process of decomposing a problem into smaller, intermediate steps to enhance the quality of the final output. It typically takes more time to arrive at an answer, but the result is more likely to be accurate, notably in contexts involving logic or coding. Reasoning models are derived from conventional large language models and fine-tuned for chain-of-thought reasoning through reinforcement learning.

(See: Large language model)

This is a more precise notion than an “AI agent,” signifying a program capable of independently taking sequential actions to achieve a goal. A coding agent represents a specific instance applied to software development. Rather than merely suggesting code for a human to review and input, a coding agent can autonomously write, test, and debug code, managing the type of iterative, trial-and-error tasks that typically occupy a developer’s time. These agents can traverse entire codebases, identifying bugs, executing tests, and applying fixes with minimal human oversight. Envision it as hiring an exceptionally fast intern who never tires and remains focused — though, as with any intern, a human must still evaluate the work.

Though a somewhat versatile term, compute generally pertains to the essential computational power that enables AI models to function. This processing capability fuels the AI industry, providing the capacity to train and deploy its powerful models. The term often serves as shorthand for the types of hardware supplying the computational power — such as GPUs, CPUs, TPUs, and other forms of infrastructure that form the foundation of the contemporary AI sector.

A subset of self-enhancing machine learning in which AI algorithms are designed with a multi-layered, artificial neural network (ANN) structure. This configuration enables them to establish more intricate correlations compared to simpler machine learning models, like linear models or decision trees. The framework of deep learning algorithms is inspired by the interconnected pathways of neurons within the human brain.

Deep learning AI models can autonomously identify significant features in data, rather than depending on human engineers to define these attributes. The structure also supports algorithms capable of learning from mistakes and, through repetition and modification, improving their outputs. However, deep learning systems necessitate a substantial amount of data points to produce satisfactory results (millions or more). They also generally require longer training times compared to simpler machine learning algorithms — resulting in higher development costs.

(See: Neural network)

Diffusion is the underlying technology for many art-, music-, and text-generating AI models. Inspired by physics, diffusion systems gradually “deconstruct” data structures — such as photographs, songs, and so forth — by adding noise until nothing remains. In physics, diffusion is a spontaneous and irreversible process — sugar dissolved in coffee cannot revert to its cubical form. Conversely, diffusion systems in AI aim to learn a form of “reverse diffusion” process to reconstruct the deconstructed data, acquiring the capability to retrieve data from noise.

Distillation is a method used to extract knowledge from a large AI model utilizing a ‘teacher-student’ framework. Developers issue requests to a teacher model and record the responses. These responses are sometimes compared with a dataset to assess their accuracy. The outputs are then employed to train the student model, which is designed to mimic the behavior of the teacher.

Distillation can facilitate the creation of a smaller, more efficient model based on a larger model with minimal distillation loss. This is likely the process through which OpenAI developed GPT-4 Turbo, a quicker variant of GPT-4.

While all AI companies utilize distillation internally, it may have also been adopted by some AI firms to catch up with leading models. Distillation from a competitor usually breaches the service agreements of AI APIs and chat assistants.

This refers to the additional training of an AI model to optimize its performance for a more specific task or domain than what was previously emphasized during its training — typically by providing new, specialized (i.e., task-specific) data. 

Numerous AI startups are using large language models as a foundation to develop commercial products but are striving to enhance utility for a particular sector or task by supplementing initial training phases with fine-tuning based on their specific domain knowledge and expertise.

(See: Large language model [LLM])

A GAN, or Generative Adversarial Network, is a machine learning framework that supports significant advancements in generative AI related to generating realistic data — including but not limited to deepfake technologies. GANs employ a pair of neural networks, one which leverages its training data to produce an output that is then evaluated by the other model.

The two models are essentially programmed to compete against each other. The generator strives to produce outputs that the discriminator cannot identify as artificially created data, while the discriminator’s objective is to detect such data. This structured competition can enhance AI outputs to appear more realistic without the necessity for further human involvement. Although GANs are most effective for specific applications (such as creating realistic images or videos), they are less suited for general-purpose AI.

Hallucination is the term preferred by the AI industry to describe instances where AI models fabricate information — essentially generating incorrect data. This presents a significant challenge for AI quality. 

Hallucinations can produce outputs from GenAI that may mislead and could potentially lead to real-world dangers — such as harmful medical advice resulting from a health query.

The issue of AIs concocting information is believed to stem from gaps in their training data. Hallucinations are driving a movement toward more specialized and/or vertical AI models — that is, domain-specific AIs that necessitate narrower expertise — as a method to minimize the chances of knowledge gaps and mitigate disinformation risks.

Inference is the execution of an AI model. It involves unleashing a model to make predictions or derive conclusions from previously seen data. To clarify, inference cannot occur without prior training; a model must learn patterns from a data set before it can effectively infer from this training data.

Various types of hardware are capable of performing inference, ranging from smartphone processors to powerful GPUs and custom-designed AI accelerators. However, not all can operate models equally efficiently. Very large models would take considerable time to predict outcomes on a laptop compared to a cloud server equipped with top-tier AI chips.

[See: Training]

Large language models, or LLMs, are the AI architectures utilized by well-known AI assistants, like ChatGPT, Claude, Google’s Gemini, Meta’s AI Llama, Microsoft Copilot, or Mistral’s Le Chat. When you interact with an AI assistant, you are engaging with a large language model that processes your request directly or with the aid of various tools available, such as web browsing or code interpreters.

LLMs are deep neural networks consisting of billions of numerical parameters (or weights, as explained below) that learn the relationships between words and phrases and formulate a representation of language, akin to a multidimensional map of words.

These models are developed by encoding the patterns they detect in billions of books, articles, and transcripts. Upon prompting an LLM, the model produces the most probable pattern that corresponds to the prompt.

(See: Neural network)

Memory cache signifies a crucial process that enhances inference (the process by which AI generates responses to user inquiries). Essentially, caching represents an optimization strategy aimed at increasing inference efficiency. AI fundamentally relies on high-level mathematical calculations, and every time those calculations are performed, they consume more energy. Caching is intended to decrease the number of calculations a model may need by retaining specific computations for future queries and operations. There are various forms of memory caching, with KV (or key-value) caching being one of the more recognized. KV caching functions in transformer-based models, enhancing efficiency and delivering quicker results by minimizing the time (and algorithmic effort) necessary to generate answers to user questions.   

(See: Inference)  

Model Context Protocol, or MCP, is an open standard enabling AI models to connect to external tools and data — your files, databases, or applications like Slack and Google Drive — without the need for developers to create custom connectors for every individual pairing. Think of it as a USB-C port for AI. Anthropic introduced MCP in 2024 and later transferred it to the Linux Foundation, and it has since been adopted by OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft, making it one of the fastest-spreading standards in recent AI history.

Mixture of Experts is a model architecture that divides a neural network into numerous smaller specialized sub-networks, or “experts,” and activates only a select few for any specific task. Instead of routing every request through the entire model — much like gathering your entire office for every inquiry — an MoE model possesses an internal “router” that selects the appropriate specialists for the task at hand. This capability allows for the construction of large models that remain relatively swift and economical to operate, since only a fraction of the network is active at any given time. Mistral AI’s Mixtral model serves as a well-known example; OpenAI’s newer GPT models are also broadly believed to utilize some variation of this methodology, though the company has never officially confirmed it.

(See: Neural network, Deep learning)

A neural network pertains to the multi-layered algorithmic framework that supports deep learning — and, more broadly, the entire surge in generative AI tools following the emergence of large language models. 

Although the concept of deriving inspiration from the intricately interconnected pathways of the human brain as a design model for data processing algorithms extends back to the 1940s, the recent advent of graphical processing units (GPUs) — driven by the gaming industry — truly unlocked the potential of this theory. These chips proved exceptionally efficient for training algorithms with many more layers than what was feasible in earlier periods — enabling neural network-based AI systems to achieve significantly better performance across multiple fields, including voice recognition, autonomous navigation, and drug discovery.

(See: Large language model [LLM])

Open source pertains to software — or, increasingly, AI models — whose underlying code is made publicly accessible for anyone to use, examine, or alter. In the realm of AI, Meta’s Llama family of models is a notable example; Linux serves as the famous historical counterpart in operating systems. Open source methodologies permit researchers, developers, and companies globally to build upon each other’s work, expediting progress and enabling independent safety audits that proprietary systems cannot easily facilitate. Closed source refers to situations where the code is proprietary — you can utilize the product but not understand how it operates, as is the case with OpenAI’s GPT models — a distinction that has evolved into one of the hallmark debates in the AI sector.

Parallelization signifies performing multiple tasks simultaneously rather than sequentially — akin to having 10 employees working on different aspects of a project concurrently instead of a single employee handling everything one after the other. In AI, parallelization is essential for both training and inference: modern GPUs are specifically engineered to execute thousands of calculations in parallel, which significantly contributes to their establishment as the hardware backbone of the industry. As AI systems increase in complexity and models expand in size, the capability to parallelize processes across numerous chips and machines has become one of the most vital factors in determining the speed and cost-effectiveness of model development and deployment. Research into enhanced parallelization strategies is now a specialized area of study in its own right.

RAMageddon is the catchy new term describing an increasingly troublesome trend affecting the tech sector: a persistent shortage of random access memory, or RAM chips, which are integral to nearly all the tech products we rely on daily. With the growth of the AI industry, major tech companies and AI laboratories — all competing to build the most powerful and efficient AI — are purchasing vast amounts of RAM to support their data centers, leaving scant supply for everyone else. This supply bottleneck results in rising prices for what remains.

This shortage extends to industries like gaming (where prominent companies had to hike console prices because of difficulties in sourcing memory chips for their devices), consumer electronics (where the memory shortage could lead to the largest decline in smartphone shipments in over a decade), and general enterprise computing (due to insufficient RAM for their own data centers). The price surge is anticipated to stabilize only once the feared shortage resolves, but, unfortunately, there is currently little indication that this will happen anytime soon.  

Similar to AGI, recursive self-improvement signifies a boundary for how intelligent AI might become and to what extent it may minimize reliance on humans. In the scenario of RSI, AI models begin to enhance themselves autonomously without human input, resulting in a rapid increase in capabilities and independence. In certain narratives, this represents a cataclysmic event akin to the singularity, a moment when AI models become impervious to external intervention. However, RSI also describes a fundamental ability — can an AI model create its own successor? — which simplifies the task for engineers aiming to construct it. Several up-and-coming AI startups are focused on developing recursively self-improving models, yet most downplay any apocalyptic consequences, presenting RSI merely as the next research frontier.

Reinforcement learning constitutes a method for training AI where a system learns by experimenting and receiving rewards for correct responses — somewhat like training a beloved pet with treats, except in this case, the “pet” is a neural network and the “treat” is a mathematical signal indicating success. Divergent from supervised learning, where a model is taught on a predetermined dataset of labeled examples, reinforcement learning enables a model to explore its environment, take actions, and adjust its behavior based on received feedback. This approach has proven particularly effective for training AI to play games, control robots, and, more recently, to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models. Techniques like reinforcement learning from human feedback, or RLHF, are now integral to how leading AI laboratories refine their models for improved helpfulness, accuracy, and safety.

When considering human-machine interaction, several evident challenges arise — individuals communicate using human language, whereas AI systems perform tasks through complex algorithmic procedures influenced by data. Tokens serve to bridge that divide: they represent the fundamental units of interaction between humans and AI, corresponding to discrete segments of data that have been processed or generated by an LLM. They are produced through a process known as tokenization, which segments raw text into manageable units that a language model can interpret, akin to how a compiler translates human language into binary code that a computer can comprehend. In enterprise environments, tokens also dictate costs — most AI businesses charge for LLM usage on a per-token basis, implying that the more a business utilizes the system, the more it incurs in expenses.

Thus, tokens refer to the small units of text — often fragments of words rather than complete ones — that AI language models disassemble language into before processing; they are broadly comparable to “words” for the sake of comprehending AI workloads. Throughput denotes how much can be processed within a certain timeframe, hence token throughput essentially functions as a gauge of the amount of AI work a system can manage simultaneously. High token throughput is a crucial objective for AI infrastructure teams, as it determines how many users a model can serve concurrently and how quickly each can expect a response. AI researcher Andrej Karpathy has expressed feeling anxious when his AI subscriptions remain idle — echoing the concern he experienced during his graduate studies when costly computer hardware wasn’t maximally utilized — a sentiment that encapsulates why maximizing token throughput has become a focal point in the field.

Developing machine learning AIs involves a process termed training. Simply put, this refers to data being provided to enable the model to learn from patterns and produce useful outputs. Essentially, it involves the system responding to characteristics in the data, which allows it to adapt outputs towards a desired objective — whether that involves identifying images of cats or generating a haiku upon request.

Training can incur significant costs because it demands numerous inputs, and the required volumes have been steadily increasing — which is why hybrid methods, such as fine-tuning a rules-based AI with targeted data, can help manage expenses without starting entirely from zero.

[See: Inference]

A technique in which a previously trained AI model is utilized as the base for developing a new model aimed at a different but typically related task — permitting the knowledge acquired in prior training cycles to be reapplied. 

Transfer learning can promote efficiency by expediting model development. It can also be advantageous when there is limited data available for the task for which the model is being crafted. However, it’s imperative to recognize that this approach has limitations. Models utilizing transfer learning to gain generalized competencies will likely need additional data training to excel in their specific focus area.

(See: Fine tuning)

Validation loss signifies a metric that indicates how effectively an AI model is learning during training — with a lower value being preferable. Researchers monitor it attentively as a form of real-time assessment, using it to determine when to cease training, when to modify hyperparameters, or whether to investigate potential issues. One of the main concerns it helps highlight is overfitting, a circumstance where a model memorizes its training data instead of genuinely learning patterns it can generalize to new situations. Think of it as distinguishing a student who comprehensively grasps the material from one who merely memorized last year’s exam — validation loss aids in revealing which type your model is developing into.

Weights are fundamental to the training of AI, as they ascertain the significance (or weight) assigned to differing features (or input variables) within the training data — thereby molding the AI model’s output. 

To rephrase, weights are numerical parameters that delineate what is most salient in a dataset for the designated training task. They fulfill their role by applying multiplication to inputs. Model training typically initiates with weights that are assigned randomly, but as the training progresses, the weights adapt as the model aims to arrive at an output that aligns more closely with the target.

For instance, an AI model designed to predict housing prices based on historical real estate data for a specified location could incorporate weights for attributes such as the number of bedrooms and bathrooms, whether a property is detached or semi-detached, and whether it includes parking, a garage, among others. 

Ultimately, the weights the model attaches to each of these inputs represent how significantly they influence the value of a property based on the given dataset.

This article is updated regularly with new information.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

The browser conflicts are no longer centered on search — here are the top options besides Chrome and Safari

The browser conflicts are no longer centered on search — here are the top options besides Chrome and Safari

This year, the competition among web browsers has evolved: The rivalry now extends beyond search outcomes to include which company’s AI will represent you within the browser. Google Chrome and Apple’s Safari remain the leading choices in the market, with Chrome benefiting greatly from its proactive integration of generative AI into search functionalities. However, 2026 has ushered in a surge of new players — spanning from well-capitalized startups to established tech giants — all wagering that the browser will increasingly transform into not merely a means of accessing the internet but a personal assistant capable of accomplishing tasks for you.

For users seeking options beyond Chrome and Safari, a diverse array of alternative browsers is emerging, challenging the dominance of the major players. To assist in navigating this competitive environment, we have curated a summary of some of the leading alternative browsers currently on the market. This encompasses browsers utilizing AI, open-source platforms promoting customization and privacy, along with “mindful browsers”—a novel term characterizing browsers crafted to enhance user wellness.

AI-driven browsers

Image Credits:Perplexity

Perplexity’s Comet

Perplexity is the latest startup to debut an AI-driven web browser, named Comet. This new tool functions as a chatbot-based search engine, capable of tasks like summarizing emails, navigating web pages, and handling actions like sending calendar invitations. Currently, it’s available exclusively to users on Perplexity’s $200/month Max plan, but a waitlist is offered for those interested.

The Browser Company’s Dia

Dia Hero
Image Credits:The Browser Company

The Browser Company, which is the force behind the Arc browser, has recently launched Dia, a browser focused on AI that resembles Google Chrome but integrates an AI chat tool. 

Currently in an invite-only beta stage, Dia is tailored to assist users in navigating the internet more efficiently. It can track all websites visited by a user and any sites they are logged into, allowing it to support users in locating information and completing tasks. For example, Dia can deliver insights about the current page being viewed, provide answers to product inquiries, and summarize uploaded documents. 

To gain early access to Dia, users must be members of Arc, while non-members can register for the waitlist.  

Opera’s Neon

Opera neon
Image Credits:Opera

Another recent addition to the AI-focused browser landscape is Opera’s Neon, which possesses contextual awareness, enabling functions such as researching, shopping, and coding assistance. Significantly, it can execute tasks even when the user is offline. 

Neon is available on both macOS and Windows, with a subscription fee of $19.90 per month.

OpenAI’s Atlas

OpenAI logo with spiraling pastel colors (Image Credits: Bryce Durbin / TechCrunch)
Image Credits:Bryce Durbin / TechCrunch

OpenAI has recently rolled out its AI-enabled web browser, dubbed Atlas. This browser allows users to inquire to ChatGPT about search results and explores web pages within the chatbot rather than redirecting to external links. Additionally, an “agent mode” is available for users to ask ChatGPT to perform tasks for them.

Atlas was speculated to launch in July, but it only became accessible on macOS in October. A version for Windows, iOS, and Android devices is anticipated soon.

Aside

Supported by Y Combinator, Aside is an emerging AI-oriented, browser-inclusive automation platform crafted to autonomously execute tasks, fill forms, and manage data for users. The company describes the experience succinctly: “Provide it your passwords, browsing history, and browser context.” Unlike conventional automation tools that depend on integrations, Aside functions directly within the browser, enabling it to operate across Gmail, Notion, Slack, Figma, and various banking platforms.

Users can enroll on the waitlist prior to its launch.

Jatter

Jatter introduced its AI-powered browser in June, empowering users to pose questions about any web page, discover relevant insights, and receive tailored recommendations based on their browsing behaviors. Furthermore, Jatter integrates a Notes app, allowing it to learn from the notes, summarize them, and highlight important points.

Jatter is available on Mac, Windows, iOS, and Android platforms, being free to use with an optional subscription priced at $10 per month.

Privacy-oriented browsers

Image Credits:Brave

Brave

Brave stands out as one of the more reputable privacy-centric browsers, renowned for its integrated ad and tracker blocking features. It adopts a gamified approach to browsing, rewarding users with its cryptocurrency called Basic Attention Token (BAT). By opting to view ads and supporting their favorite sites, users earn a share of the ad revenue. Additional functionalities include a VPN, an AI assistant, and video calling options. 

DuckDuckGo

Image Credits:DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo is another known browser, thanks to its associated search engine. Founded in 2008, the company has recently scaled up its browser by integrating generative AI features, including a chatbot. Additionally, it has improved its scam detection system to identify a broader array of scams, encompassing fraudulent cryptocurrency platforms, scareware tactics, and deceptive e-commerce sites. Besides anti-scam measures, DuckDuckGo blocks trackers and ads, and it does not monitor user data, resulting in fewer pop-ups for users.

Ladybird

Image Credits:Ladybird

Ladybird, spearheaded by the GitHub co-founder and former CEO Chris Wanstrath, has set ambitious objectives compared to its competitors: It aims to create a completely new open-source browser from ground zero. This entails avoiding reliance on existing browser codes—a rare achievement. Most alternative web browsers utilize the Chromium open-source project maintained by Google, which serves as the foundation for a significant number of browsers. 

Like its privacy-focused counterparts, Ladybird will incorporate features to reduce data collection, including an integrated ad blocker and the capability to obstruct third-party cookies. The browser has yet to launch, with an alpha version slated to debut in 2026 for early access users, available on Linux and macOS.

Vivaldi

Image Credits:Vivaldi

Vivaldi is a browser founded on Chromium technology, developed by one of the original creators of the Opera browser. Its chief attraction is a highly customizable interface that allows users to modify its looks and toggle features on or off. A distinguishing aspect is that the browser’s color shifts to correspond with the website currently being viewed. Additional notable features include ad blocking, a password management system, no tracking of user data, and various productivity functionalities like a calendar and note-taking tools.

Specialized browsers

Image Credits:Opera

Opera Air

Opera unveiled the Air browser in February, establishing itself as one of the first mindfulness-oriented browsers in the field. While Opera Air operates like a conventional web browser, it incorporates unique elements aimed at promoting mental wellness. These features include reminders for breaks and breathing exercises. A further addition, termed “Boosts,” offers a collection of binaural beats that can aid concentration or relaxation.

SigmaOS

Image Credits:SigmaOS

SigmaOS is a Mac-exclusive browser featuring a workspace-oriented interface that prioritizes productivity. It displays tabs in a vertical manner, allowing users to manage them like a to-do list that can be marked as finished or snoozed for later. Users can set up workspaces—essentially clusters of tabs—to better differentiate activities, like separating professional tasks from leisure.

This Y Combinator-supported browser has been operational for several years and has recently begun integrating more AI capabilities, such as summarizing various elements on a web page, including ratings, reviews, and prices. Additionally, it features an AI assistant that can respond to queries, translate text, and rewrite content.

SigmaOS is free to use, but those seeking more than three workspaces can opt for a paid plan at $8 per month, which allows for unlimited workspaces.

Zen Browser

Image Credits:Zen Browser

Zen Browser strives to foster a “calmer internet” through its open-source platform. Zen facilitates tab organization into Workspaces and features a Split View mode allowing users to view two tabs at once, alongside other productivity-enhancing tools. Users can also enrich their browsing experience with community-created plug-ins and themes, including a modification that makes tab backgrounds transparent.

This article has been revised following publication to include newly introduced browsers.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

The Dune keypad gadget can serve as your meeting manager and beyond

The Dune keypad gadget can serve as your meeting manager and beyond

One of my main annoyances with meeting applications is that every single one has a unique shortcut for silencing your microphone or disabling your webcam. It becomes challenging to keep track of which keys perform which functions when you’re in the midst of a meeting trying to make a point or pose a query. I have always desired a physical, universal button for mute and camera control — something I could press without a second thought. Project Mirage’s Dune, a compact, three-key aluminum keypad — roughly the dimensions of a piece of gum — that connects to your MacBook’s USB-C port, accomplishes exactly that.

The $119 device features three buttons, and its functionality shifts depending on the application you are using. For example, in meeting apps and websites, it might function as toggle mic, toggle video, and bring window to the front. In Excel or Sheets, it could serve as copy, paste, and undo. For Chrome, it could be refresh, jump to URL bar, and paste. You understand the concept. Developers can also implement it with tools like VS Code or GitHub to merge, approve, or close a pull request.

The startup customizes each unit to fit your particular Mac model, ensuring that it aligns perfectly against the laptop with no gap underneath. If your ports are occupied, you can connect it using a dongle instead. Dune operates without a battery and does not require an external charger — it draws power directly from the MacBook.

[embedded content]

Currently, the startup accommodates M2 Air or later and M1 Pro or later models of MacBook running macOS 15 Sequoia or subsequent versions.

The device has a pleasant appearance and feel, but I found that the keys lacked sufficient resistance. Presently, it is quite simple to accidentally press a key. On several occasions, I unintentionally unmuted myself or disabled my camera because my hand brushed against the device while reaching for a bottle of water or a coffee mug. It shouldn’t be this straightforward to trigger a key.

Dune comes with a companion app for setting up shortcuts, whether per-app or system-wide. Within a specific application, you can link a Dune key to a keyboard shortcut, a command, or a link that launches an app or URL.

Image Credits:Project Mirage

Through the app, Dune also connects with your calendar and displays your upcoming meeting a few minutes prior to its start, allowing you to join, dismiss, or send an “I’m running late” message with a single tap.

For further customization, you can write and execute your own Python script. If coding isn’t your forte, Dune offers seamless integration with Claude Desktop: You articulate the shortcut you desire in simple language, and Claude generates it and assigns it to a key for that application — no manual setup needed.

I created a shortcut that, whenever I’m on a startup’s webpage, retrieves a brief overview of the company: its rivals, funders, and inquiries I might pose if I arranged a meeting with them. For anyone whose role involves quickly evaluating companies — investors, founders, operators — it’s a task perfectly suited for Dune. I also developed one that converts images to JPEG format so I can swiftly upload them to WordPress or social media. Both were straightforward to create and required no manual configuration, although getting a shortcut fully operational still involves some back-and-forth with Claude, including troubleshooting once you actually run it.

The app additionally features a marketplace, where users can discover skills created by other Dune owners. If the marketplace gains traction, it could become essential to Dune’s growth and retention strategy — hardware serving as a lightweight front end for a Claude-powered skills ecosystem, where each new skill provides owners with another incentive to remain engaged.

However, at this time, the selection of skills is limited. Furthermore, there is no option to test a skill without assigning it to the hardware button — ideally, the app would allow you to preview a skill before committing it to the hardware. The startup also needs to actively introduce more of its own recommended skills for different applications to its users.

Project Mirage’s device sells for $149 after its introductory price concludes, and it’s an excellent choice for anyone focused on productivity. MuteMe merely addresses mute/unmute, and Stream Deck offers business-oriented macros, but Dune is simpler to personalize on both hardware and software.

When you make a purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t impact our editorial independence.

Chevy created a fully American electric truck — why isn't anyone purchasing it?

Chevy created a fully American electric truck — why isn’t anyone purchasing it?

While I grew up managing my father’s Chevrolet S-10 pickup truck from the passenger side, I’m not precisely the demographics Chevy targets. I prefer hatchbacks over pickups. However, after driving around Detroit for a day in the Silverado EV, I came to see that Chevy might convert me into a truck enthusiast after all.

The Silverado EV handles almost like a car. The bed is enormous, and the frunk is spacious. The rear seat has ample room for me to stretch out my annoyingly long legs, and the cabin is serene. It’s capable of powering your home during a hurricane, and it tows, hauls, and steers down the highway without any effort required. Furthermore, it covers over 400 miles on a single charge. This should ideally attract any American pickup aficionado.

Yet, it hasn’t been flying off dealership lots. GM moved around 14,000 units last year across the U.S. and Canada. In contrast, the gasoline Silverado sells ten times that amount in a single quarter. After my experience behind the wheel, I find myself perplexed. GM could have produced the quintessential American EV, yet it’s failing to thrive on the market.

A large front trunk is shown.
The Silverado EV’s frunk is sizable, able to swallow several roller bags.Image Credits:Tim De Chant

Could it be the aesthetics? At first glance, the Silverado EV brings to mind the classic Chevy Avalanche, and whether that’s a positive or negative rests on your opinion of the original model. Like the Avalanche, the Silverado EV features four doors, a compact bed that extends into the cabin, and a “sail” design element that reduces drag. I thought the EV looked decent, but then again, I’m not particularly a truck enthusiast.

The Silverado EV poses at GM's Tech Center.
The Silverado EV is a polished full-size truck, literally.Image Credits:Tim De Chant

Stepping in demands a significant lift, but once inside, it’s roomy and inviting. Press the brake, and the Silverado EV comes alive, with sharp displays dominating the lower portion of your view. The seats are impressive, and like several electric vehicles, it accelerates with enthusiasm when you apply pressure with your right foot. At nearly 20 feet long, the Silverado EV certainly isn’t small, yet with rear-wheel steering, it maneuvers through a parking lot as easily as a compact hatchback. That is until you attempt to fit it into a tight parking spot.

A screen shows 80% inside an electric pickup truck.
The cockpit should look familiar to anyone who has sat in a recent Chevrolet EV.Image Credits:Tim De Chant

The infotainment system powered by Google is sharp and clearly laid out, with commendable responsiveness. It may not quite match the speed of an iPhone, but it’s pretty close, and the voice control features are effective. Below the vents, you’ll find knobs for volume and temperature along with some HVAC controls that can also be manually adjusted. Fortunately, Chevy hasn’t forgotten how to include physical controls.

The navigation uses a Google service, hence it performs well. When I voiced my destination, it presented several route choices, similar to Google Maps on your phone, but with an added feature: Below the typical time-to-destination display, there’s an estimate of how long you’ll be able to use Super Cruise, GM’s hands-free driving feature. Prefer to drive less? Opt for the route that maximizes your time in Super Cruise. Over the years, GM has given various reasons for removing CarPlay from its EVs, and this might be one of its more compelling justifications. That said, I still don’t fully agree with that move, though.

A folding partition separates the cabin from the bed.
The Silverado EV borrows the mid-gate feature from the old Chevy Avalanche.Image Credits:Tim De Chant

On the subject of Super Cruise, its hands-free, Level 2 advanced driver-assistance technology lives up to the praise. In March, I tested the Bolt equipped with Super Cruise and was quite impressed, although my experience was brief. With the Silverado EV, I navigated through the Detroit area during peak traffic hours. Given the size of this truck, Super Cruise is imperative, facilitating a relatively serene driving experience.

However, it does have some drawbacks. Maintaining its position in the lane can be somewhat challenging. Just like my previous experience with the Bolt, Super Cruise could be confused by vehicles speeding up and merging in from the right.

One particularly stressful moment occurred when the Silverado EV almost collided with a dirty paint mixer trailer. Maybe the paint-splattered taillights baffled the system? In reality, the radar should have detected it sooner.

Overall, Super Cruise contributed to a smooth ride, with a lot of the credit going to the 205 kilowatt-hour battery pack located midship. It’s quite substantial in weight. But also a shoutout to the ride and handling engineers, who clearly put in considerable effort. Among trucks, this one rides smoothly.

Perhaps even more noteworthy was the efficiency. I managed around 2.1 miles per kilowatt-hour, which is roughly 10% to 20% lower than my average in my Audi e-tron, a smaller vehicle with significantly less frontal area facing the elements.

So why are sales lagging?

Some analysts have pointed fingers at the Silverado EV’s high asking price, but I remain skeptical. Buyers of full-size pickups typically spend around $66,000, just $5,000 less than the MSRP of a Silverado EV LT Extended Range, which offers 410 miles on a full charge. (The LT Max Range variant I drove will provide an additional 68 miles but is priced $20,000 higher.)

Others also cite the EV’s limited towing range, which falls short by about 60%. Again, this shouldn’t be a deterrent. According to Strategic Vision, approximately 75% of full-size truck owners tow once a year at most, meaning there are roughly 400,000 fossil fuel Silverado owners poised for a switch. Yet the sales numbers show otherwise!

It seems that GM and competing manufacturers miscalculated the truck market, which tends to exhibit resistance to change, not of the kind that arises from maneuvering a 4.5-ton vehicle. Potential purchasers are anxious about range, charging times, and likely other concerns I might not have considered. This hesitance has hampered EVs in general — particularly EV trucks.

It’s unfortunate, really. Most of those worries diminish after some time with an EV, and the Silverado EV is a commendable first iteration of an electric pickup truck. With some additional engineering, could the builder reduce its weight? That would enhance payload and towing capacity while also enabling a smaller battery, thus lowering expenses.

A view of the Silverado EV's bed.
The “sail” behind the cabin of the Silverado EV helps with aerodynamics.Image Credits:Tim De Chant

GM may tackle the pricing issue in the near future. The company has strongly hinted that the Silverado EV will adopt a new battery chemistry, lithium-manganese-rich (LMR), which could cut costs by about $6,000 while maintaining range sometime in the coming years. If those reductions are passed on to consumers, it would align the EV’s pricing with that of the fossil fuel variant.

If such adjustments occur and lower the price slightly, I could definitely see myself pondering the Silverado EV. Too bad it’s oversized for my 1950s two-car garage. I’d need to find a bigger home for my truck. And what could be more American than that?

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.