Cognition’s Scott Wu asserts that AI coding agents ought not to substitute for humans

Cognition’s Scott Wu asserts that AI coding agents ought not to substitute for humans

Cognition CEO Scott Wu has made waves once more this week as his AI coding agent startup, just two years old, secured $1 billion in funding at a valuation of $26 billion. Cognition is known for Devin, among the pioneering and arguably most effective AI coding agents available. According to the CEO, Devin “naturally manages tasks from start to finish.”

In the recent blog post announcing the funding, Cognition outlined a vision of a future where “we are transitioning to a realm of self-driving software development.”

So, is it possible for Devin to take over the role of a mid-level L4 programmer? Yes and no, Wu stated to TechCrunch. “We’ve never seen it as a replacement for humans. I understand that this is a common narrative, but it has never been our perspective.”

In this chaotic year of 2026, where it seems like every day another tech CEO declares job cuts in the name of replacing employees with AI, Wu emphasizes his desire for coders to retain their jobs. “We are all programmers ourselves,” he remarked. “I started coding at the age of nine.”

Indeed, Wu has been recognized as one of the most skilled child competitive programmers in history, as highlighted in a recent piece by Colossus. In second grade, Wu claimed victory in a nationwide math contest for seventh-graders, which led to a youth filled with math and programming competitions. This also connected him with other prodigies who would later establish AI tech startups, including Scale AI founder Alexandr Wang.

Thus, he explains to TechCrunch, the intention has never been to render human programmers redundant.

“When we initiated the development of Devin, it’s a bit amusing,” he reflected, “but we genuinely regarded it as: this is your companion who assists you in building more.” He even showcased a small stuffed animal holding a computer, his own version of a Devin teddy bear, which he keeps on his desk. He considers it a tangible representation of the Devin AI coder “This is my friend that helps you create more.”

Wu does not wish for AI agents to diminish the joy of programming for people.

“It’s no secret that most software engineers enjoy crafting software, right?” he noted. “If you ask them why, they’ll generally respond, ‘Well, it’s like I get to create things from nothing. I can take my entire concept and transform it into a product. I can convert it into an experience.’”

Similarly to how visual development environments abstracted software creation from machine instructions, he perceives agents as another level of abstraction between imagining a software product and realizing it.

Nevertheless, Cognition claims that Devin’s primary function within the company is to produce nearly all software. The firm asserts that 89% of code committed by its engineers was accomplished by Devin, with the remainder attributed to local agents in Windsurf, the AI coding challenger they acquired last year.

Wu elaborates that his agent primarily handles the long-tail maintenance tasks that many programmers typically dislike: updating outdated software; migrating applications from one platform to another. Agents will liberate programmers “from much of the drudgery, enabling them to engage much more in creative work,” he assures.

Thus, Wu is resistant to the notion of Devin “replacing” human programmers. He acknowledges that while it can function independently, its performance aligns “somewhere between a junior and a mid-level engineer” based on the task requirements.

Regarding the idea of self-driving software, where the agent learns and enhances itself, potentially enabling it to operate at higher levels (“recursive” being the trending term in AI these days), Wu states, “I believe we are in for an exhilarating journey.”

He envisions agents making their way into additional sectors where they’ll acquire tasks, from customer support to healthcare, but hopes that the objective remains to augment human workers in those areas as well.

“Coding and software have been the first to evolve, but we will observe this phenomenon in all these other fields,” he forecasts. “One thing that has been clear to us since the beginning is, it should always be up to the human to decide what to do … you can really see this in software engineering, but I think it applies to all these other professions as well.”

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Today marks the final day to submit your application to present at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026.

Today marks the final day to submit your application to present at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026.

TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 is set to take place from October 13–15 at Moscone West in San Francisco — and there are just a few hours left to apply to speak.

We’re calling on founders, investors, operators, and tech specialists to submit their applications for a chance to present at one of the year’s most significant tech gatherings.

Over 10,000 leaders from startups and VC firms will come together at Disrupt 2026 to delve into the next big developments in AI, scaling, fintech, infrastructure, robotics, and innovative future trends.

Applications will close tonight at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply now to showcase your knowledge and contribute to shaping the dialogues that will define the tech sector.

Choose your session format

We’re seeking impactful speakers to facilitate one of two session formats:

Breakout Sessions: A 30-minute presentation (up to 4 speakers, including a moderator) followed by a 20-minute audience Q&A. Capacity is 100 participants.

Roundtables: A 30-minute discussion led by a speaker, aimed at up to 40 attendees. No slides or audiovisuals — just insights and dialogue.

TechCrunch Disrupt 2024 Breakout Session
Image Credits:Slava Blazer Photography

Understanding the application process

Every application will undergo a thorough review by our editorial team. Finalists will be chosen for the Audience Choice voting — where TechCrunch readers will determine which sessions get to present on the Disrupt Stage. Discover more about speaking on Disrupt’s Call for Content page.

Shape the dialogue at Disrupt 2026

If you possess actionable insights, practical experience, and a passion for positively impacting the tech landscape, we are eager to hear from you. Submit your application before today’s cutoff.

TechCrunch Disrupt 2026, October 13-15

When you buy through links in our articles, we might receive a small commission. This does not impact our editorial integrity.

Last 24 hours to secure up to $410 off your TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 pass

Last 24 hours to secure up to $410 off your TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 pass

Here we go. The timer is nearly up. You now have until tonight at 11:59 p.m. PT to secure Early Bird discounts of up to $410 for TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 before rates rise.

If Disrupt has been on your agenda, this is your last opportunity to lock in the lowest rates available before the next price increase. After this deadline, the savings will also be gone.

Sign up now and join over 10,000 founders, investors, operators, and innovators at Moscone West in San Francisco from October 13–15 for three days filled with networking, startup exploration, and dialogues shaping the tech industry’s future. Bring a guest at 50% off, or form a group to receive up to 30% off.

TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 24 hours left

Why Disrupt is a Must-Attend Event Year After Year

TechCrunch Disrupt is the place where startup energy intensifies. The gathering connects individuals actively creating, financing, and expanding what’s next in AI, fintech, SaaS, climate, cybersecurity, consumer tech, and more.

Participants attend Disrupt for:

  • Direct engagement with investors, founders, and operators making impactful moves.
  • Discussions that foster partnerships, funding opportunities, and recruitments.
  • Practical advice from leaders of high-growth companies.
  • A sneak peek at cutting-edge technologies before they go mainstream.

With over 300 exhibiting startups, Startup Battlefield 200, tailored networking opportunities, and several programming stages, Disrupt is structured to assist attendees in forming significant connections and making real business advancements.

TechCrunch Disrupt Expo Hall
Image Credits:Eric Slomonson, The Photo Group

Crafted for those shaping the future

Disrupt caters to founders seeking investment, investors on the lookout for opportunities, operators scaling their firms, and innovators aiming for an advantage. Whether you’re launching the next big idea, enlarging your network, or following technological advancements, Disrupt connects you with industry leaders.

Gain insights directly from industry-leading tech figures

Every year, Disrupt unites hundreds of significant voices from the startup and venture capital landscape. Previous speakers have represented organizations and firms influencing the future of AI, enterprise software, fintech, consumer tech, and additional fields.

Sam Altman OpenAI OpenResearch
Image Credits:David Paul Morris/Bloomberg / Getty Images

This year’s event will continue the tradition of excellence, featuring over 200 sessions on six industry-specific stages, along with roundtables and breakout sessions addressing scaling, AI, fintech, infrastructure, robotics, and emerging tech. Discover the evolving agenda for the latest updates on sessions and speakers.

Confirmed speakers include:

Up to $410 in savings end tonight at 11:59 p.m. PT

Early Bird discounts of up to $410 end tonight at 11:59 p.m. PT. Following this, ticket prices will rise.

Register now to obtain your TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 pass at a reduced price before the cutoff time. Bringing more than just yourself? Receive a 50% discount on a second ticket, or save up to 30% on community passes.

TechCrunch Disrupt 2024 exhibitor
Image Credits:Silkroad (opens in a new window)

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Kiwibit’s AI-driven bird feeder has become my latest companion in the backyard

Kiwibit’s AI-driven bird feeder has become my latest companion in the backyard

At the beginning of this month, I acquired the Kiwibit Bird Feeder Pro 4K AI Camera, and it has quickly turned into my favorite accessory for the backyard. 

The setup process is quite simple. Several mounting choices enable you to position the feeder on a pole, the edge of a window, or a tree. The two seed compartments are engineered for simple refills and easy cleaning. The solar panel on top guarantees that you won’t have to stress about battery life.

Strength and camera performance are also noteworthy highlights. Additional specifications include compatibility with 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, cloud storage, integrated two-way audio complete with a microphone and speaker, and a 130-degree wide-angle lens.

Image Credits:Kiwibit

Once I set it up in the yard, I linked the feeder to the corresponding Kiwibit app on my smartphone. In this app, you can receive notifications when a bird appears, view recordings, and monitor all the visits.

A few weeks into the trial period is when the real enjoyment began. My phone chimed with a notification each time a new bird arrived, and I found myself excitedly anticipating updates. Even during very rainy days, I managed to attract a handful of birds, including a beautiful northern cardinal that I now look forward to seeing every morning. At the time of writing this, the device has successfully documented visits from six different species. 

Image Credits:Screenshot of Kiwibit app on iOS

Since then, I’ve been hooked. I find myself eagerly checking the app every morning to see which little bird has visited. I share the videos with nearly everyone I know as if they were my own pets. One funny notification I frequently receive is “a nuisance animal detected” whenever squirrels raid my birdseed supply (which occurs as regularly as you’d think). 

The app employs Kiwibit’s exclusive bird-identification algorithm to recognize over 10,000 bird species, including blue jays, ravens, and mourning doves. The Activity tab is especially beneficial, as it logs the number of “visits” recorded, videos saved, and total species seen. You can also browse through the calendar to check specific days. The Birds tab provides extensive information on each species, including detailed descriptions sourced from Wikipedia.

However, I did observe that the system — which usually is priced between $179.99 to $249.99, based on the model — sometimes struggles with accurately counting “visits.” For instance, if a house sparrow feeds in front of the camera for several minutes, the AI might mistakenly log it as numerous visits, even if the bird hasn’t moved considerably. 

Image Credits:Screenshot of Kiwibit’s iOS app

In conclusion, using the Kiwibit Bird Feeder Pro has been a joy. If you’re searching for a method to engage with nature while having fun collecting bird species like Pokémon, give this intelligent feeder a try. Just be ready for all the squirrels to show up as well. 

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

What ClickUp’s mass layoff tells us about the future of work

What ClickUp’s mass layoff tells us about the future of work

AI’s biggest champions have argued for some time that the technology will usher in an era of unprecedented productivity gains, richly rewarding workers who harness it while displacing those who don’t.

Zeb Evans, CEO of the collaboration software startup ClickUp, claims that this shift is imminent. Last Thursday, Evans announced on X that the company, which was last valued in 2021 at $4 billion, had laid off 22% of its workforce yet characterized that reduction as not a cost-cutting measure, but rather a radical embrace of AI that will propel the company to the next level.

“Most savings from this change will flow directly back into the people who stay. We’ll be introducing million-dollar salary bands. If you create outsized impact using AI, you’ll be paid outside of traditional bands,” Evans wrote.

ClickUp recently introduced roughly 3,000 internal AI agents to handle a wide range of complex tasks on behalf of its employees, according to a Fortune article published several days ago. Instead of performing the work themselves, staff members are now expected to direct these agents and ultimately review the output to ensure it meets the company’s standards.

Evans’s goal, according to his X post, is for AI to turbocharge ClickUp into a “100x org.”  

ClickUp is not alone in its hope that AI agents will provide massive productivity gains.

In fact, according to a recent Gartner survey, about 80% of companies using autonomous tech have cut jobs. However, the study found that workforce reductions aren’t necessarily translating into meaningful financial returns.

While Gartner’s findings suggest some companies use unproven AI as an excuse to downsize, ClickUp maintains it is not one of them.

Evans told TechCrunch via email that the startup is indeed seeing productivity gains from AI agents. Not only is ClickUp measuring those efficiencies internally, but it’s also apparently gearing up to include them in a forthcoming product for its customers.   

“Instead of gamifying token cost, we gamify value created and time saved,” Evans wrote.

In recent months, a growing number of companies have started monitoring employee token consumption, using it as a metric to see who is actually adopting AI tools. But critics argue that “tokenmaxxing”—as this concept is known—is the wrong metric because it simply racks up AI expenses.

“The people that automate their jobs with AI will always have a job,” Evans claimed in his post. But if AI keeps taking over more tasks, ClickUp will eventually need fewer and fewer people, eliminating those who fail to automate their functions well.

Tech circles have long theorized about this scenario.

One extreme example of a high-profile startup using AI automation to the max already exists. Polsia, a one-year-old startup that claims to handle all software operations for solopreneurs, is run by just one person: its founder and CEO, Ben Broca. That efficiency is apparently paying off: Polsia just raised $30 million at a $250 million valuation.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Top 6 Smokers and Grills of 2026: Intelligent, Portable, Pellet

Top 6 Smokers and Grills of 2026: Intelligent, Portable, Pellet

The Nomad showcases an innovative design that folds into a suitcase shape. Its robust handles and latches are built to last. Weighing in at 28 pounds, it is relatively heavy for one-hand carrying, yet its configuration and large handle simplify transportation compared to smaller, budget-friendly alternatives.

With a dual-venting system, the Nomad ensures adequate airflow, even when the lid is shut. The vents and raised fins on the base lift the charcoal, promoting air circulation beneath, which allows for precise temperature regulation at both high and low levels. This grill may be vital for enthusiasts of overlanding.

An Excellent Budget Portable Grill: WIRED reviewer Scott Gilbertson also commends the straightforward Weber Jumbo Joe ($90), a compact variant of the classic Original Kettle. It is an effortless selection for tailgating and can be utilized at home with a DIY stand. It is cost-effective, lightweight, and simple to use.

Other Suggested Grills

Recteq X-Fire Pro 825 for $1,400: Pellet smokers often fail to reach temperatures above 450°F, lacking the sear provided by charcoal or gas grills. However, Recteq’s 825-square-inch, dual-pot X-Fire Pro aims to serve as a multipurpose tool, as stated by WIRED reviewer Kat Merck. In Smoke Mode, the left pot ignites for low-and-slow smoking. Shifting to Grill Mode activates both pots, with a damper over the right side for control ranging from a slight opening to 1,200°F. Achieving this high temperature takes about 20 minutes and can be ignition-filled if the fire pot is not well-maintained. For either intense heat or a gentler 600°F sear, it delivers a robust grilling experience. However, the dual igniters require a heavy-duty extension cord. While it doesn’t generate the same smokiness as WIRED’s top choice, the Recteq Flagship 1600, smoke tubes can be employed at lower temperatures for enhanced smokiness. The claimed 20-pound pellet capacity is split between the pots, necessitating multiple refills for prolonged cooking.

Traeger Woodridge Pro for $1,000: The Traeger Woodridge Pro has been a previous favorite pellet grill and smoker for many. It offers excellent value and functionality, making it popular in neighborhoods. It is easy to clean, user-friendly for perfect ribs, and spacious enough for two pork bellies. Although the new top choice Recteq comes with additional features, such as temperature history on probes and a gentler learning curve for smart capabilities, the Woodridge continues to be a favorite.

Traeger Timberline Wi-Fi Wood Pellet Grill for $3,300: For dedicated grilling and smoking aficionados, Traeger’s Timberline serves as an enhancement over conventional smokers. It acts as a comprehensive outdoor kitchen with wireless smoking technology, adding features like an induction burner suitable for searing with a cast-iron skillet or steaming vegetables. It can hold six pork shoulders or equivalent amounts of ribs or chickens. Former WIRED editor Parker Hall has served many with it and lauds its capability to cook meats uniformly. Available in an XL version for even larger capacity, it offers flawless smoking from the comfort of your home for those with no price concerns.

Masterbuilt Gravity Series 800 for $899: This Masterbuilt intertwines the charcoal taste with precise temperature management typical of gas or electric grills, according to WIRED reviewer Chris Smith. The top-loading charcoal hopper uses gravity to deliver heat into an enclosed area, while an integrated fan allows for accurate temperature regulation via the device or an app. It achieves 700°F within 15 minutes while maintaining remarkably stable temperatures once established. Enhance smoke flavor by adding wood chunks to the ash bin, letting charcoal embers do their thing. Though versatile, it cannot sear over a flame and requires swapping out the internal housing before using the flat-top grill.

Yoder YS640S Pellet Smoker for $2,700: Most grills excel in one area but lag in others. Yoder’s YS640S is a multifunctional tool, thanks to its design that facilitates easy access to the auto-feed firebox. Like more affordable Traegers, this Kansas-made grill utilizes an electric fan and auger to supply wood pellets for a leisurely smoke. A control board gives temp alerts and Wi-Fi temperature management. Handling ribs and a chuck roast with ease, it maintains temperature well due to its sturdy 10-gauge steel construction, weighing about as much as a refrigerator. As a grill and potential pizza oven, it excels. Remove a steel plate above the fire pit for direct searing or swap in a pizza oven attachment ($489) for baking over 900°F.

A Grill to Avoid

Kamado Joe Konnected Joe for $1,900: This kamado-style grill wowed with features like electric ignition and Wi-Fi connectivity for monitoring internal and meat temperatures, which WIRED had previously endorsed. However, extended use revealed issues, with WIRED commerce director Martin Cizmar experiencing ongoing problems with tripping.

Oto Smart Sprinkler Review (2026): Solar-Operated and User-Friendly

Oto Smart Sprinkler Review (2026): Solar-Operated and User-Friendly

Once set up, the configuration of the Oto sprinkler system resembles that of the Aiper and the pricier Irrigreen applications. You establish a zone and utilize the app to outline its limits. Like the previously mentioned systems, Oto’s sprinkler is built for precise watering, directing water in a narrow beam in one direction rather than a broad spray. However, Oto’s spray remains comparably slim, focusing on a specific, designated area instead of creating a two-dimensional sheet of water akin to Irrigreen’s “water printing” technology. This is clearly illustrated as you outline your yard’s borders.

Oto, akin to its rivals, permits you to designate each zone as a spot (for irrigating an individual tree), a line (for a flowerbed), or a 2-D space (for a yard). I experimented with all these modes but primarily concentrated on area zones, which present the highest complexity. In terms of defining an area zone, Oto’s setup is nearly the same as Irrigreen and Aiper, although it does respond slightly more slowly to inputs. Nonetheless, it remains very intuitive: A straightforward interface enables you to place points around the sprinkler to outline the zone’s borders. As soon as you complete a full loop around the sprinkler, the zone is established.

After configuration, every zone may be assigned a schedule with multiple options regarding watering days (odd days, even days, selected days of the week, or daily) and a start time (though it does not sync with sunrise or sunset). Each schedule comes with a weekly watering cap (in inches of depth), which is dispersed over each week’s watering intervals. Weather intelligence capabilities allow for the skipping of watering if your zip code receives significant rainfall or if wind speeds are elevated; both rely on internet reports, and you can modify the rainfall amount and wind speed necessary to trigger a skip. The app tracks the 20 most recent runs and includes a calendar for upcoming occurrences.

Oto’s method for watering a zone entails moving in circular arcs around the sprinkler, then progressively broadening the coverage with each pass. Additional “cleanup” runs ensure thorough coverage of the area without dry spots. The speed and size of the water beam guarantee effective coverage. After test sequences, the yard was sufficiently damp across the entirety of the zone, with no dry areas.

As with any sprinklers, fluctuations in water pressure can occasionally lead to over- or underwatering in particular zones, yet this was minimal with the Oto. However, watering at the outer end of Oto’s range may demand sufficient power to create a strong splashdown, potentially leading to soil erosion or harm to delicate plants.

The Oto also incorporates a “play mode” that allows you to utilize the sprinkler for a fun chase game or a random “splash tag” feature, where you attempt to evade being hit by water. Pro tip: Avoiding getting hit is nearly impossible.

Fancy Butt Cushions Are Essential at the Musk v. Altman Trial

Fancy Butt Cushions Are Essential at the Musk v. Altman Trial

The final witnesses provided their testimony on Wednesday in the Musk v. Altman trial. The statements were rather uneventful, save for the revelation that Microsoft has poured over $100 billion into its collaboration with OpenAI. More captivating, though, is a point my colleague Maxwell Zeff and I have been reflecting on after nearly three weeks of following the trial.

The courtroom features a variety of seat cushions.

On the right side of US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers’ courtroom, a number of wooden benches are designated for the attorneys, executives, and team members from OpenAI and Microsoft. Roughly 10 individuals, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and general counsel Che Chang, have utilized plush black cushions, the most luxurious being from the Purple brand, retailing for $120 at Target. These cushions come in different shapes, with some having rounded edges while others are square. On Wednesday, Chang adjusted one behind his back, a rare adjustment during such proceedings.

OpenAI President Greg Brockman and his wife, Anna, have been present for much of the trial, consistently using pristine white pillows. The pillows, recognized by their tags, seem to be from Coop, a brand specializing in sleep products that offers a two-pack for $35.

On Wednesday, an OpenAI security guard brought a purple handbag into the courtroom, holding a pillow for each Brockman. Anna swiftly handed her husband a pillow before arranging her own. At the same time, OpenAI chief futurist Joshua Achiam took Brockman’s seat later on but initially did not have a pillow until he eventually acquired a standard black cushion.

OpenAI has not responded to requests for comment from WIRED.

A seasoned technology attorney informed WIRED that cushions aren’t “typical” but noted, “it’s not out of left field.” He personally hasn’t witnessed lawyers utilizing cushions or pillows in his cases, although he has never been part of a trial this extensive.

The main litigators enjoy fairly comfortable leather chairs, though they show signs of wear, hinting that the cushioning may not be as supportive as it seems.

During my last significant time in the courtroom in 2021 for parts of the Epic Games v. Apple trial, Covid-related capacity restrictions allowed for ample space. This time, however, the courtroom is almost at its capacity of 150, with bench seating for around 90 attendees.

About an hour into my initial trial day in late April, I thought of bringing my own cushion because of the rigid benches but hesitated for fear of appearing weak. None of the regular reporters, around two dozen including one who was pregnant, initially used cushions. I withstood six days of growing discomfort.

After an uncomfortable morning last week, I decided to try a “cooling” cushion from the Tokyo Olympics. It was too small and thin to provide any real relief. My back particularly ached as I typed notes on the Musk-themed jackass trophy, which allegedly once had its own pillow.

In the end, I gave up on the cushion. However, one reporter from the New York Times eventually gave in to using one, and the courtroom artist, equipped with a colorful cushion, continued to utilize theirs. Perhaps I’ll discover a more suitable solution by next week when Gonzalez Rogers considers potential penalties.

Maxwell Zeff contributed to this report.

This article is part of Maxwell Zeff’s Model Behavior newsletter. Find previous editions here.

xAI Purchases 19 Gas Turbines During Continuing Legal Dispute

xAI Purchases 19 Gas Turbines During Continuing Legal Dispute

xAI has incorporated 19 natural gas turbines into its second data center campus located in Southhaven, Mississippi, over the last two months, as per internal emails reviewed by WIRED. These additions come amidst xAI’s ongoing legal battle with the NAACP and various environmental organizations, claiming the company is breaching the Clean Air Act by operating over twenty natural gas turbines at the location without the necessary air permits. Correspondence between an official from the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality and a representative from Trinity Consultants, acquired through a public records request by the Southern Environmental Law Center and shared with WIRED, reveals that xAI set up 19 portable gas turbines on its Southaven site between late March and early May. This raises the total count to 46 turbines at the site. A spreadsheet attached in the email to MDEQ includes a column titled “Total Power Output” that seems to enumerate the megawatt capacity of each turbine on the premises. xAI appears to have added on more than 500 megawatts of natural gas turbines since mid-March. Combusting natural gas can emit greenhouse gases and deteriorate air quality. Officials from the MDEQ and xAI did not respond to WIRED’s request for comments. The introduction of the new turbines to the site, referred to as Colossus 2, was initially reported by Mississippi Today. “As noted by the facility, all portable/temporary turbines are outfitted with control technology to reduce emissions,” agency spokesperson Jan Schaefer informed Mississippi Today. “MDEQ is assessing the situation and will notify the facility when it can no longer install additional portable/temporary turbines on-site.” In April, the NAACP, in conjunction with the SELC and Earthjustice, initiated a lawsuit against xAI, asserting that the company had been managing a “private power plant” in Southaven by operating 27 gas turbines without the required permits. Ben Grillot, an attorney with SELC, states that the organization identified six more turbines at the site during a drone flyover in April. It was only after reviewing the MDEQ emails that the team discovered the presence of 19 additional turbines. Based on the dates in the email reviewed by WIRED, eight of the 19 new turbines, amounting to over 200 megawatts of output, were installed following the lawsuit filing. The original xAI location, Colossus 1, situated just across the state border in Memphis, Tennessee, faced significant backlash in 2024 after residents claimed that gas turbines at that site were operating without a permit. Colossus 1 is located in Boxtown, a historically Black neighborhood that has long struggled with air quality issues. Regulators in both Tennessee and Mississippi have indicated that due to the non-stationary nature of xAI’s turbines, the company has a year to utilize them without permits in accordance with the Clean Air Act. Last July, Memphis’ local health department granted a permit for the turbines at the Colossus 1 location, despite considerable community opposition. In March, confronted with similar community protests, the MDEQ issued an air permit for the Southaven site to operate 41 gas turbines. (SELC contends that the 27 turbines cited in its lawsuit and those added to the site in recent months are not included in this permit. Neither xAI nor the MDEQ provided answers to WIRED regarding whether the turbines mentioned in the emails are encompassed by the air permit approved in March.) Drone footage and public records obtained by the news outlet Floodlight indicate that several turbines at the site were operational in the weeks leading up to the permit approval by the MDEQ.

Elon Musk Contemplated Bequeathing OpenAI to His Children, States Sam Altman

Elon Musk Contemplated Bequeathing OpenAI to His Children, States Sam Altman

Sam Altman appeared in court on Tuesday during the Musk v. Altman trial, being questioned by lawyers for Elon Musk regarding his purported past of misleading conduct. The cross-examination held great importance for Musk, who has faced difficulties in presenting a solid case. Altman addressed claims from former associates questioning his reliability.

Emphasizing this proof is vital for Musk, not only for prevailing in the lawsuit but also in the realm of public perception. Just days prior to the trial, Musk messaged OpenAI president Greg Brockman, insinuating that they might soon “be the most hated men in America.”

Musk’s legal action alleges that Altman misappropriated the OpenAI charity, rerouting Musk’s $38 million contribution to establish a for-profit enterprise valued at over $850 billion.

However, on Tuesday, minimal evidence was provided to back Musk’s claims. Both Altman and Sam Teller, Musk’s former chief of staff, stated they did not remember Musk imposing any stipulations on his donations to OpenAI. It seems that Musk initiated his lawsuit too late, years after suspecting a breach of charitable trust, with the statute of limitations having lapsed.

Brockman, his spouse Anna, and OpenAI’s chief futurist Joshua Achiam were present in the audience. Nonetheless, Musk did not remain for Altman’s testimony, as flight records indicate he headed to the Washington, DC, area before a trip to China with President Donald Trump.

Before engaging with Musk’s lawyers, Altman shared his perspective through inquiries from OpenAI’s attorneys. He portrayed himself as an entrepreneur passionate about the potential of AI. He asserted that Musk has consistently aimed to dominate OpenAI, recounting an eerie incident when Musk suggested transferring control to his children in the event of his death. Altman detailed Musk’s 2018 effort to establish an AI division at Tesla, offering Altman a position in it, as a subtle threat to OpenAI’s survival.

Intense Questioning of Altman

Musk’s attorney, Steven Molo, initiated the cross-examination by questioning Altman’s trustworthiness. Altman affirmed his belief in his own reliability but stated it’s up to the jury to reach a conclusion. The dialogue progressed:

Molo: Do you consistently speak the truth?

Altman: I’m certain there are times in my life when I have not.

Molo: Do you fabricate stories to promote your business interests?

Altman: No.