A Solo Hit Won't Disable the Gulf's Desalination Infrastructure

A Solo Hit Won’t Disable the Gulf’s Desalination Infrastructure

Across the region, facilities associated with water and electricity, such as desalination plants, are under threat or experiencing damage due to Iranian attacks aimed at locations outside traditional areas.

A single attack is unlikely to sever the gulf’s water supply. The system can manage isolated interruptions, but prolonged or multi-site assaults could quickly put pressure on supply.

“In the Gulf, desalination is engineered with sufficient buffer capacity so that the loss of one facility doesn’t instantly impact the availability at the tap,” remarks Rabee Rustum, a professor of water and environmental engineering at Heriot-Watt University Dubai.

In Kuwait, Iranian drone strikes have damaged power and desalination facilities and ignited fires at oil sites. Other regions, including Fujairah in the UAE, may also be at risk.

“Attacking desalination facilities would be tactical but could cross a line,” observes Andreas Krieg, a senior lecturer at King’s College London.

Water infrastructure is unique. “It’s not merely another utility,” Krieg emphasizes. “In regions that depend on desalination, it underpins civilian survival, public health, hospital functions, sanitation, and fundamental state credibility.”

International humanitarian law provides specific protection to civilian assets essential for survival. “This is why assaults on water systems carry significant legal and ethical consequences,” Krieg further states.

These occurrences highlight a structural reality: Desalination is crucial for water supply in the gulf, and any disruption swiftly impacts everyday life.

How the System Manages Disruption

Initially, desalination appears at risk. Shutting down a facility diminishes supply. In actuality, the system features multiple layers of redundancy.

Plants are dispersed across several sites, enabling output redistribution if one slows down. Water is stored at various network points, including central reservoirs and tanks, creating a buffer for delays.

Veolia, an environmental services provider that oversees nearly 19 percent of the region’s desalination, indicates the water supply is diversified through numerous facilities along the coast.

The company further notes that distribution systems are interconnected, allowing plants to assist and substitute for one another, thereby ensuring service continuity.

In the UAE, storage can last around a week, while in other regions, it’s restricted to two to three days, according to Veolia.

This indicates that the system can temporarily manage disruptions. Once reserves are exhausted, water supply relies on the capability of plants to generate enough to satisfy demand.

The System That Generates Water

Unlike many regions, the Gulf does not depend on rivers or precipitation. It relies on desalination plants along the coast, continuously converting seawater into drinkable water.

Seawater undergoes processing through reverse osmosis or thermal methods, eliminating salt and impurities. The resulting water is distributed, stored, and sent to homes, hospitals, and industries.

It is a rigid system, designed for ongoing operation, supporting cities, industries, and services. Gulf states produce approximately 40 percent of the world’s desalinated water, with over 400 plants in operation.

Dependence varies but remains high across nations. In the UAE, desalination comprises 41 to 42 percent of total water usage, 90 percent of Kuwait’s drinking water, and around 70 percent in Saudi Arabia.

When Disruption Becomes Apparent

For residents, disruption isn’t immediately perceived—water continues to flow.

Rustum notes that buildings contain internal storage and pumps, concealing early changes in supply. Water pressure usually remains stable as the system adapts.

The US Saw a Notable Increase in Battery Demand Last Year

The US Saw a Notable Increase in Battery Demand Last Year

In 2025, the United States saw a historic rise in energy storage, as detailed in a freshly released solar industry report on Monday. This boom in battery storage signifies a considerable milestone for clean energy amid the renewable-unfriendly second term of the Trump administration and suggests that utilities may be modifying electric grids to meet increasing demand across the country.

The report, issued by the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), corresponds with recent findings from Bloomberg New Energy Finance, showcasing a comparable surge in battery development. As per SEIA, the United States added 57 gigawatt hours of new energy storage in 2025, representing nearly a 30 percent rise from the prior year. This capacity is enough to supply power to over five million homes each year.

The report predicts a 21 percent market growth by the conclusion of this year, with an additional 70 gigawatt hours anticipated in 2026. These statistics sharply contrast with less than a decade ago when storage on the grid amounted to only around half a gigawatt.

Batteries have demonstrated considerable political endurance. Tax incentives for wind and solar were cut last summer amid legislative challenges to renewables, yet faced opposition from Republican lawmakers in regions with clean energy initiatives. Nonetheless, battery tax credits largely remained unharmed.

In spite of the federal administration’s position on renewables, batteries and solar experienced considerable advancement in certain conservative states last year. Texas stands out, where solar energy constituted over 15 percent of summer demand, exceeding coal for the first time. SEIA projects that Texas will outpace California this year in terms of gigawatt hours of storage deployed.

Jigar Shah, from the advisory firm Multiplier and a former director of the Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office, points out that Texas’s independent and deregulated power grid favors solar and batteries over alternative solutions, notwithstanding White House opposition. Recent surveys reveal that MAGA voters back solar power, and prominent individuals like Katie Miller have voiced support for solar energy.

“Texas fundamentally ignores cultural prejudices,” Shah states. “‘Heed the market signals. Construct whatever you wish, whether it’s coal plants or batteries.’ Batteries received the most financial backing.”

While solar and batteries thrive in Texas, the majority of battery installations last year were standalone, not linked to particular solar projects, which is a positive trend for grids coping with heightened demand.

Generally, US energy grids utilize only about 50 percent of their available energy on a daily basis. This intentional underutilization guarantees capacity for peak demand days. Deploying batteries at all levels of the grid aids in harnessing surplus energy during off-peak hours to mitigate waste.